Liberty and Recovery

17 Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord. (2 Corinthians 3:17–18 NKJV)

Two thoughts keep racing around my mind – liberty and recovery.  Liberty is the King James word for freedom.  One can’t help but think about the inscription on the Statue of Liberty,

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses, yearning to breath free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest tossed,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door. – Emma Lazarus

Where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty.  Daily, I want to watch people learn to breath free.

The second thought that keeps rolling around is the idea of recovery.  Most of our “huddled masses” and “tempest tossed” are in recovery.  Primarily they are recovering from things like alcohol, drugs and co-dependency.  However, this isn’t the sense in which I am thinking of recovery.  I’m thinking of bigger picture recovery.  We are all recovering from sin and recovering to the image of God.

How do these two things go together?  I think we find liberty in recovering the image of God.  Jesus said, “If the Son sets you free, then you are free indeed.” (John 8:36)  Here are some thoughts on how I think we get there:

We must insist on acting like repentant sinners.  No more pretending that we don’t have problems.  No more pretending like we are merely sinners saved by grace.  We are repentant sinners and that means we are new creations living new lives with changed hearts.  We must learn to love, accept and forgive.

Yet many of us think something is to be gained from the church apart from learning to acknowledge our sinfulness and our utter dependence upon God.  To the extent that the church legitimates this error – by offering, instead, social capital, childcare, entertainment, family time, and so on – the church is accountable for its failure to provide hospitality, sustenance and redemption to the addicted person in its midst.  (Addiction and Virtue, 187)

We apprentice ourselves to Jesus and to another disciple.  There is no way on earth that we are going to learn to live the recovered life alone.  In fact, our track records prove the opposite.  Al we know is how to mar the image of God.  We need others to show us the way; to show us what it looks like to follow Jesus.  Every follower of Jesus must take it upon himself or herself to find someone to apprentice and someone who can apprentice them.

We must devote ourselves to one another.  There are no short cuts here.  Jesus spent three years in ministry and discipleship development.  During that time he is only alone for a few brief scenes as he wanders off early in the morning for prayer.  Every other scene of his life includes the disciples.  Recovering the image of God requires lots of shared time and shared space.

If the church is to be a place where […] persons may find redeeming fellowship, it will have to become a primary social hub.  It must facilitate and expect of its members friendships that are rooted in the day-to-day sharing or ordinary activities. … it must provide daily, rather than once-weekly opportunities for communal worship, testimony and prayer, and it must challenge its parishioners to treat the church as their primary social community.  (Addiction and Virtue, 191)

I want to be part of a church that takes the tired and helps them camp in the Almighty’s shade, the poor and see they discover Jesus’ worth, the huddled masses yearning to breath free and give them fresh hope, the wretched refuse and clothe them in the righteousness of Jesus, the homeless and help them find refuge in the Most High’s shelter, and the tempest tossed and see that they meet the one who can calm the storms.  I want to be part of that kind of church.

Love, Acceptance and Forgiveness

Jerry Cook sets forth to articulate his philosophy of the church in Love, Acceptance and Forgiveness: Being Christians in a Non-Christian World.  While it would seem from the title that the book is about these three values they only appear intermittently throughout the book.  Rather than an articulation of love, acceptance and forgiveness, this book is a look at the difference between church as a field and church as a force.

Chapter one looks briefly at the prerequisites of the church’s ministry: love, acceptance and forgiveness.  “If people are not guaranteed these three things, they will never allow us the marvelous privilege of bringing wholeness to them through the fellowship of the church.” (12)  The church must learn to enjoy people, so they can like people, so they can love people.  The church must learn to communicate the significance of each individual through the act of acceptance.  The church must learn to forgive as they have been forgiven.  Cook reminds the reader that love is not license for misbehavior.  Acceptance is not agreement.  Forgiveness is not compromise.

Chapter two addresses the need for a guiding philosophy of ministry.  Such a philosophy is essential if the pastor is to avoid three common pitfalls of pastoral ministry: (1) pastoring from crisis to crisis; (2) becoming trendy; (3) simply accepting what is handed down to them.

Chapters three through eight address the concepts of church as a field and church as a force.  The church as a field is characterized by its need for visibility and attractive programming. Its goals are focused on attendance, budget and facilities.  The church as a field accomplishes ministry by bringing people into the facilities and pulling them out of the culture.  What motivates the church as a field is getting people in and keeping people in because people serve the facilities, pay for the facilities and keep the facilities from shrinking.  The main danger with this approach is second- and third-generation mediocrity.  The founding generation may be well enough excited but the second- and third-generation have no stake in the accomplishments and they begin to settle for mediocre.

The church as a force, on the other hand, is characterized by an emphasis on worship, training and fellowship.  The goals of the church as a force are personal: each member coming to wholeness, equipped and released into the world to minister.  The church’s ministry then is the automatic result of great healing, which is, great outreach.  The motivation is wholeness and holiness in every person.  These realities are recognized by the church as a force:

  • The saints are already equipped for ministry by virtue of being filled with the Holy Spirit.  They only need opportunity, permission and guidance.
  • The power is in the gospel, not the presentation or the delivery.  Let the people share the gospel.
  • Ministering is not inviting people to church services.  Inviting people to services is called “inviting people to services.”  Ministry is serving people.
  • Every generation must equally disrespected.  In other words, they all count!
  • Teaching a biblical lifestyle – going beyond mere biblical knowledge – is best done within the context of the family (Deut 6 and Eph 6).  Therefore, train your families to train their children and train your families to bring those without family into their family.
  • Schism and conflict are never left alone, but confronted directly and firmly for the sake of the body. (Titus 3:9-11)
  • The people are primary and the building is secondary, maybe even lower.
  • The church is present in the world as a servant bringing healing.

In the final chapter, Cook offers his closing thoughts on leading a church as a force.  First, he offers to sure ways to kill the church: micromanagement and unfocused methods of delivery.  Two questions we must always ask are: (1) Are we reproducing the life of Christ in our congregation? and (2) Are we ministering as Jesus in our world?  Those who lead the church as a force will demonstrate the following characteristics: authenticity (the ability to live life with the members of the church), a clear and reproducible lifestyle of following Jesus, an appreciation of the natural network of friendship, and will be a collector of stories that demonstrate God’s power in fresh and contemporary ways.

First, what the book doesn’t offer is an explanation of love, acceptance and forgiveness.  These themes are briefly mentioned but not explained in great detail.  One is left with the understanding that they are important and you’ll know them when you see them.  There is no discussion on how to cultivate these virtues within the body.  The book’s chapters also seem to lack any coherent connection as they jump from church staff, to marriage, to programming, to discipleship in the family.  Each of the chapters are wonderful and provide the reader with food for thought, but they simply don’t flow together to form a meta-narrative.

What I appreciate about the book is its consistent look at what it means to be the body of Christ.  I agree with the author that too few pastors have seriously considered their theology of the body of Christ.  I recently wrote a brief pamphlet for my denomination of the subject of the body of Christ and was surprised by the paucity of resources.  Jerry Cook gets it absolutely right when he writes,

One thing working all kinds of devastation in the life of the church is the failure of  the leadership to have a solid philosophy – a well-defined concept of how a church ought to operate and why.  In the absence of such a philosophy, pastors tend to do one of the following: (1) they pastor from crisis to crisis, (2) they pick up on the current fad, or (3) they simply subscribe to a concept of church life handed down to them. (27)

The people themselves are the ministers and Sunday morning is a meeting of the church staff.  If this is true then Sunday mornings should include ministry reports, personal reports, brainstorming, evaluation and feedback, admonishment, updates, directives, calendaring, training, fellowship, etc.  Staff meetings are much more participatory than the typical Sunday morning worship service.  If it really is a staff meeting then that means we must really work for someone, i.e. Jesus the King!

People must be trained in their gifts and given permission to use their gifts.  Permission and authority have to be given away by the leadership.  Responsibility must be retained by the leadership.  This is scary but it seems to be the secret to every member functioning.

The church is people, redeemed, filled with the Holy Spirit, equipped to serve, meeting needs everywhere in Jesus’ name.  The church focuses on worship, training and fellowship because these are the things that produce Spirit-filled people who can meet other’s needs in Jesus’ name.  Therefore, the pastor’s job is to equip the saints, not meet their needs.

The body must disrespect every generation equally – in preaching, song selection, style, structure, programming, etc.  They all matter to God so they must all matter to us.  This is why every generation must be connected to the life of the body in a vital and visible way.  Age-appropriate experiences and programming is great, but they must not become substitutes for the body of Christ.  The goal of children’s ministry and youth ministry then is to integrate them into the life of the body of Christ.

The family is the God-designed context for discipleship of children.  This is most clearly seen in Deuteronomy 6 and Ephesians 6.  The church often fails, its children’s and youth ministries often fail, and even its private Christian schools often fail at discipleship because the church fails equip families to engage in the process of discipleship.

“The answer is in the room.”  This phrase must become the heart of the members.  They must learn to see themselves as the solution to the problem, not the professionals.

The church must always ask two questions: (1) Are we reproducing the life of Christ in our members? and (2) Are we ministering as Jesus in the world?  Everything we do must produce a resounding YES to these questions.

Kickball Philosophy of Ministry

This past Monday I played kickball.  I think the last time I played kickball was in the 80’s.  One of our youth arranged the game and organized it so that it was youth against the “old people.”  In our case, if you were 30 years old or older you were “old.”  I won’t address that in this post.  After reflecting on the game (and have a good conversation with a friend about it) here are some of my thoughts and my Kickball Philosophy of Ministry.

The teams were very different.  The home team was youthful, energetic, unexperienced, and a level of arrogance that comes from a naive hope of certain victory.  The visitors were seasoned with developed talent, a depth of experience and certain level of humility that comes from hard work, victory and defeat.

The visiting team had been playing kickball before anyone on the home team was born.  We knew the rules and the proper interpretation of the rules.  We knew what field etiquette was expected and followed suit.  We had our kickball values solidly in place and they were there for a reason.

The home team thought they had invented kickball.  They brought their own rules to the field and new interpretations of our rules.  Field etiquette was familiar, but even that took slight nuanced differences.  They shared the same kickball values but lived them own in a completely different way.

On both teams there were players who were fully engaged the entire time, whether they were winning or losing.  No amount of taunting or cheering could detour them.  They knew they were there to play kickball and they were resolved to do so and nothing else.  Then there were those who only played when they were winning or when they were at bat (or is that at kick?).  If they weren’t happy they quit and did their own thing.  There were those who cheered from the sides but never really entered the game.  There were those who quit early for a variety of reasons.

Ministry is a lot like kickball.  Here’s what I mean:

  • we have created home and visiting teams among the generations and unfortunately this creates an us vs. them model; perhaps the better route would be to mix the groups and play to have fun
  • the older generations have a depth of experience and wisdom and have proven themselves in ministry while the younger generation brings a whole new level of energy and enthusiasm to the ministry; if the two spend all their time arguing about the rules of ministry or the interpretation of the rules then not much ministry will get done
  • as a member of the older generation I need to look for ways to communicate kingdom values to the younger generation without forcing the means and methods on them; some of my rules will have to give way to theirs
  • in all aspects of ministry there will be those who are committed to the end, those who only commit when they feel like it, those who watch from the side and those who quit early; my job is to help people find a place in the game where they will be set up for success
I know you’re dying to know who won.  The official score was adults 15 and youth 12, but I was able to convince everyone that the youth won 29-12 … don’t ask me how.